Australian Research

Softlink Studies

Link to 2017 Softlink Survey Results

Softlink 2016 Survey Results

Softlink 2015 Survey Results

Softlink 2014 Survey Results

Softlink 2013 Survey Results

Softlink 2012 Survey Results

Softlink 2011 Survey Results

“2017 is the eighth year of the School Library Survey for Australian schools and the third for New Zealand schools.” “The survey identifies that school librarians and library staff in Australia and New Zealand face a number of
challenges, including insufficient funding and resourcing which hinders their ability to provide services to engage and encourage student interaction. This is a significant issue as students prepare for university or further study”

“In 2014, Softlink conducted the fifth annual Australian School Library Survey. This report outlines the findings from the 2014 Australian School Library Survey into Australian school library budgets, qualified staffing levels and NAPLAN literacy results. Principal findings from the 2014 Softlink Australian School Library Survey include:

 There was a positive correlation between annual school library budgets and NAPLAN Reading Literacy results.

 There was a positive correlation between the number of school librarians employed in school libraries and NAPLAN Reading Literacy results.

 Overall, fewer schools reported a budget decrease in 2013/2014 compared to the significant percentage of schools that reported a budget decrease between 2012/2013.

 Government Secondary and Government K – 12 schools had the highest percentage of budget decreases in the 2013/2014 comparison.

 Overall, 52% of respondents indicated that they felt that their school library was adequately funded, 48% of respondents felt that the opposite was true.  The majority of school libraries had no change to their staffing levels.

 For school libraries that did change their staffing level, the more common trend was a decrease in staffing levels.

 There was an increase in the take up of eBooks in schools.”

–from Executive Summary 2014 Survey Report

Softlink made a substantial contribution to the Inquiry into School Libraries

With 511 respondents, there appears to be a clear inconsistency between annual school library budgets across education providers. From the survey it appears:

• Government secondary schools receive annual budget funding equivalent to 80% of funding for all other types of schools.

• Government primary schools receive an average of 84% of funding of all other types of schools.

• There are funding inconsistencies between the states for comparable school libraries.

This same data also suggests that where student populations are similar in size, primary school libraries are generally funded one third less than secondary schools. Softlink argues that this funding inconsistency may put at risk the development of Australia’s primary school children.

PILOT STUDY: Teacher-librarian contributions to student literacy standards

In her preliminary pilot study for her Honour’s thesis, Ann Gillespie found correlations between the work of the teacher librarian and student achievement in literacy as measured on the NAPLAN tests.

This initial pilot study informed the questions for Ann’s current PhD research into teacher librarians and evidence based practice.

“It is possible to conclude from this small pilot study that the teacher-librarian can have a positive effect on the literacy of students when certain other conditions are in place.” (p. 79)

“The initial pilot study findings tend to confirm existing research that an actively involved teacher-librarian can have a positive effect on educational outcomes of students.” (p.79)

Gillespie, Ann M. (2006) Teacher-librarian contributions to student literacy standards. pp. 1-85. (Unpublished )

2 responses

31 08 2010
How do we show principals they can NOT AFFFORD to be without TLs? « The Hub

[…] value to what we do as qualified teacher librarians?   Why isn’t the research enough?  Will increased NAPLAN results convince?  How do YOU show your principal that you make a difference and are worth the extra […]

3 03 2012

Perhaps by stopping knocking the NAPLAN in the first place. It’s interesting how teachers will use the data only when it suits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: